From 22c8ba651e01673e294e522681c7dc674e8edd15 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "N.N" Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:42:09 +0000 Subject: blah svn path=/trunk/externals/pureunity/; revision=4396 --- doc/PureUnity.lyx | 146 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 146 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/PureUnity.lyx diff --git a/doc/PureUnity.lyx b/doc/PureUnity.lyx new file mode 100644 index 0000000..853a3f4 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/PureUnity.lyx @@ -0,0 +1,146 @@ +#LyX 1.3 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/ +\lyxformat 221 +\textclass article +\language english +\inputencoding auto +\fontscheme default +\graphics default +\paperfontsize default +\papersize Default +\paperpackage a4 +\use_geometry 0 +\use_amsmath 0 +\use_natbib 0 +\use_numerical_citations 0 +\paperorientation portrait +\secnumdepth 3 +\tocdepth 3 +\paragraph_separation indent +\defskip medskip +\quotes_language english +\quotes_times 2 +\papercolumns 1 +\papersides 1 +\paperpagestyle default + +\layout Title + +PureUnity +\layout Author + +Mathieu Bouchard +\layout Date + +January 13th, 2006 +\layout Abstract + +This paper covers the theory behind PureUnity, PureData's test framework. +\layout Standard + + +\begin_inset LatexCommand \tableofcontents{} + +\end_inset + + +\layout Section + +What is testing? +\layout Subsection + +a test tests something that gets tested +\layout Standard + +(write ontological nonsense here) +\layout Subsection + +a triad of testing +\layout Standard + +I've thought of a triad: +\layout Standard + +A. + "the real thing" +\layout Standard + +B. + what it's documented as +\layout Standard + +C. + a way to verify that (1) and (2) agree +\layout Standard + +and another one: +\layout Standard + +changing A to match B+C: programming +\layout Standard + +changing B to match A+C: the scientific method (aka reverse engineering) +\layout Standard + +changing C to match A+B: unit-tests and contracts and scientific experiments +\layout Section + +Methodologies of Testing +\layout Standard + +I once called unit-tests "test-by-example" and contracts "test-by-rule". + I think that those names are preferable to the more common names. + I also hadlisted "test-by-use" which is to use the software in practice: + this may include testing a component A using the unit tests for B because + B uses A.The last I had listed was "test-by-proof", which is rarer and is + the only one that requires analysing the implementation. +\layout Subsection + +test-by-Proof +\layout Subsection + +test-by-Use +\layout Subsection + +test-by-Rule +\layout Subsection + +test-by-Example +\layout Section + +Quelques cossins +\layout Subsection + +Protocol +\layout Subsection + +Preconditions +\layout Subsection + +Postconditions +\layout Subsection + +Wrapconditions +\layout Subsection + +Inheritance +\layout Subsection + +Aspect-programming and stuff +\layout Subsection + +Meta-abstractions +\layout Subsection + +Float-Signal Polymorphism +\layout Subsection + +Unit-Tests +\layout Subsection + +Algebraic Properties +\layout Subsection + +TODO +\layout Standard + +\the_end -- cgit v1.2.1