1 files changed, 48 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/pd/doc/2.control.examples/08.depthfirst.pd b/pd/doc/2.control.examples/08.depthfirst.pd
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8820d226
--- /dev/null
+++ b/pd/doc/2.control.examples/08.depthfirst.pd
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+#N canvas 144 162 632 551 12;
+#X msg 64 51 1;
+#X obj 89 150 + 1;
+#X obj 209 187 print x1;
+#X obj 64 209 print x3;
+#X obj 114 122 print x2;
+#X obj 209 100 + 1;
+#X obj 209 129 + 1;
+#X obj 209 158 + 1;
+#X obj 64 80 t f f f f;
+#X obj 89 179 print x2;
+#X text 34 13 In Pd \, message passing is depth first \, so that in
+this patch:;
+#X text 104 51 <-- click here;
+#X text 17 243 ... you get "x1" first \, notwidthstanding the fact
+that "x2" and "x3" appear to be closer to the source. This means that
+you shouldn't do this:;
+#X msg 76 304 1;
+#X text 116 304 <-- maybe you shouldn't click here;
+#X obj 115 334 + 1;
+#X obj 76 333 f;
+#X floatatom 76 365 0 0 0;
+#X text 377 520 updated for Pd version 0.34;
+#X text 35 393 ... because the "depth" is infinite. The counters you've
+seen always have the message chain terminated somewhere in a cold inlet:
+;
+#X msg 75 453 1;
+#X obj 114 483 + 1;
+#X obj 75 482 f;
+#X floatatom 75 514 0 0 0;
+#X text 115 453 <-- better;
+#X connect 0 0 8 0;
+#X connect 1 0 9 0;
+#X connect 5 0 6 0;
+#X connect 6 0 7 0;
+#X connect 7 0 2 0;
+#X connect 8 0 3 0;
+#X connect 8 1 1 0;
+#X connect 8 2 4 0;
+#X connect 8 3 5 0;
+#X connect 13 0 16 0;
+#X connect 15 0 16 0;
+#X connect 16 0 17 0;
+#X connect 16 0 15 0;
+#X connect 20 0 22 0;
+#X connect 21 0 22 1;
+#X connect 22 0 23 0;
+#X connect 22 0 21 0;